MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3107724497 · doi:10.1093/ehjci/ehaa946.3201

Distinct remodeling pattern between pediatric and adult heart failure: a focus on Ca2+ signaling pathway at proteomic level

2020· article· en· W3107724497 on OpenAlexafffundabout
H Zhang, Uroš Kuzmanov, Simon Urschel, F Wang, S Wang, Anthony O. Gramolini, Gavin Y. Oudit

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Heart Journal · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Fibrosis and Remodeling
Canadian institutionsCanadian VIGOUR CentreUniversity of TorontoUniversity of Alberta
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsMedicineHeart failureEjection fractionCardiomyopathyInternal medicineProteomicsCardiologyBioinformaticsBiologyGeneticsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) is among the most common causes leading to end-stage heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HF-rEF) in adult and pediatric patients. Despite similar phenotypes characterized as systolic dysfunction and eccentric ventricular dilation, pediatric DCM are biologically distinct entities with age- and development-specific features in the heart. Though underlying mechanisms may vary between the two populations, it's largely unexplored with few studies conducted to date. Purpose HF-rEF typically results from impaired myocardial contractility, triggered by defective cellular Ca2+ handling and cytoskeletal remodeling. Hence, we aim to integrate clinical profile and experimental data from human explanted hearts: 1) to unravel the age-dependent disparate Ca2+ signaling pathways; and 2) to identify pediatric-specific HF signatures or potential cures for precision managements. Methods Non-ischemic failing hearts (n=6 adult and n=6 pediatric) were procured immediately after excision via Human Explanted Heart Program. Age-matched adult non-failing control hearts (NFC, n=6) were obtained from deceased donors without cardiovascular history, while pediatric NFC (n=6) were collected from children with congenital heart defects but no primary myocardial dysfunction constituting relatively reasonable controls. Myocardial metabolic and oxidative profile were evaluated spectrophotometrically, and tissue remodeling was assessed immunohistochemically. Global proteomics and phosphoproteomics were performed on a Q-Exactive mass spectrometer, followed by network biology pathway analyses. Expression of screened proteins and kinases was validated by gel electrophoresis. Apoptosis and cellular growth signaling pathways were also incorporated into analysis. Results Both HF groups had remarkably lower LVEF (26.6±10.7% in pediatric vs. 26.5±9.1% in adult DCM) while compared to the NFC (both ≥60%) respectively. Histologically, adult-DCM demonstrated significantly worse fibrosis than pediatric-DCM (p<0.01). It was consistent with excessive reactive oxygen species (ROS) production and perturbed anti-ROS defense noted in adult-DCM, indicative of possible reverse remodeling in the pediatric failing hearts with shorter course of illness till transplant. Mechanistically, NCX1 was elevated with SERCA2 decreased in adult-DCM versus adult-NFC (p<0.05), while both pediatric groups exhibited comparable levels. Reduced p-/t-phospholamban and p-/t-CaMK in adult-DCM, unlike in pediatric-DCM, also illustrated altered phosphorylation patterns. Moreover, GSK-3β and AMPK pathways were inhibited while AKT-473 was activated in adult-DCM. Conclusions Pediatric DCM exhibited less adverse remodeling partially mediated by divergent Ca2+ handling and downstream signaling pathways, illustrating the fundamental differences between adult and pediatric DCM. Our findings may provide a scientific basis for the development of specific therapies for pediatric DCM. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Public grant(s) – National budget only. Main funding source(s): Canadian Institutes for Health Research (CIHR); Heart & Stroke Foundation (HSF)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.108
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.061
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Heart JournalSame topicCardiac Fibrosis and RemodelingFrench-language works237,207