MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Rapid, High-Yielding Solid-Phase Synthesis of Cathepsin-B Cleavable Linkers for Targeted Cancer Therapeutics

2020· article· en· W3107784614 on OpenAlexafffund
Alla Pryyma, Shanal Gunasekera, J. Lewin, David M. Perrin

Bibliographic record

VenueBioconjugate Chemistry · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHER2/EGFR in Cancer Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsLinkerChemistryCombinatorial chemistrySolid-phase synthesisConjugateProtecting groupPeptide synthesisPeptideBiochemistryOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) constitute an emerging class of anticancer agents that deliver potent payloads selectively to tumors while avoiding systemic toxicity associated with conventional chemotherapeutics. Critical to ADC development is a serum-stable linker designed to decompose inside targeted cells thereby releasing the toxic payload. A protease-cleavable linker comprising a valine-citrulline (Val-Cit) motif has been successfully incorporated into three FDA-approved ADCs and is found in numerous preclinical candidates. Herein, we present a high-yielding and facile synthetic strategy for a Val-Cit linker that avoids extensive protecting group manipulation and laborious chromatography associated with previous syntheses and provides yields that are up to 10-fold higher than by standard methods. This method is easily scalable and takes advantage of cost-effective coupling reagents and high loading 2-chlorotrityl chloride (2-CTC) resin. Modularity allows for introduction of various conjugation handles in final stages of the synthesis. Facile access to such analogues serves to expand the repertoire of available enzymatically cleavable linkers for ADC generation. This methodology empowers a robust and facile library generation and future exploration into linker analogues containing unnatural amino acids as a selectivity tuning tool.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.036
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.091
GPT teacher head0.400
Teacher spread0.309 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBioconjugate ChemistrySame topicHER2/EGFR in Cancer ResearchFrench-language works237,207