MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3108095074 · doi:10.1101/2020.12.04.20237230

Development and optimization of a new method for direct extraction of SARS-CoV-2 RNA from municipal wastewater using magnetic beads

2020· preprint· en· W3108095074 on OpenAlexaffabout
Ana L. Parra Guardado, Crystal L. Sweeney, Emalie K. Hayes, Benjamin F. Trueman, Yannan Huang, Rob Jamieson, Jennie L. Rand, Graham A. Gagnon, Amina K. Stoddart

Bibliographic record

VenuemedRxiv · 2020
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSARS-CoV-2 detection and testing
Canadian institutionsAcadia UniversityDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWastewaterChromatographyElutionExtraction (chemistry)ChemistryFiltration (mathematics)Matrix (chemical analysis)Magnetic beadEnvironmental scienceEnvironmental engineeringMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The use of magnetic beads in the extraction of nucleic acids from wastewater is presented as an approach to simplify extraction techniques for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 viral fragments in wastewater. In particular, this paper describes the development and optimization of a direct method for extracting SARS-CoV-2 RNA from municipal wastewater using magnetic beads. The recovery efficiency of the method using Accuplex SARS-CoV-2 Positive Reference Material (ASCV-2) was examined. Method factors assessed were sample volume, concentration of magnetic bead mix, elution temperature, and water matrix (deionized (DI) water and wastewater). The combination of optimized method parameters that resulted in the highest RNA recovery in both DI water (26.0 ± 0.8%) and wastewater (11.8 ± 1.4%) was a sample volume of 1.0 mL, a magnetic beads concentration of 100 µL mL -1 sample, and an elution temperature of 60 °C. The performance of this optimized method was further assessed in recovery experiments using wastewater samples spiked at 1.8×10 6 and 1.8×10 4 gene copies L -1 (GU L -1 ) with Gamma Inactivated SARS-COV-2 (GI-SCV-2) and 1.0×10 6 and 1.0×10 4 infectious units L -1 of Human Coronavirus 229E (HCV 229E) as viral surrogates. Recoveries of 86.1 and 4.6% were achieved for wastewater samples spiked with GI-SCV-2 at low and high concentrations, respectively. In assessing the effects of wastewater pre-filtration and addition of DL-Dithiothreitol (DTT, used to inactivate RNases that may degrade RNA) on recovery efficiency of ASCV-2, the magnetic bead-based extraction protocol performed optimally with unfiltered wastewater without DTT (recovery = 17.4 ± 0.4%). The method limit of detection (MLOD) for ASCV-2 recovered from pre-filtered wastewater was determined to be 4.6×10 4 GU L -1 (95% degree of confidence). Using this optimized magnetic bead-based extraction protocol, the presence of SARS-CoV-2 RNA was verified in wastewater collected from sewershed locations in Atlantic Canada. This emerging RNA extraction method is direct, rapid, and does not require the use of specialized equipment, thus offering advantageous application for laboratories with limited resources. As such, this method is an indispensable tool in the monitoring of wastewater for SARS-CoV-2 to potentially understand COVID-19 infection occurrence within communities and inform public health leaders. Graphical Abstract

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.447
Threshold uncertainty score0.972

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.145
GPT teacher head0.378
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuemedRxivSame topicSARS-CoV-2 detection and testingFrench-language works237,207