Pesantren Raudhatul Ulum Dalam Pengembangan Sumber Daya Manusia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract This study aims to determine the concept or program of human resource development at Raudhatul Ulum Islamic Boarding School. The method in this research emphasizes the type of research file, while this qualitative approach is carried out as a research procedure that produces descriptive data in the form of written or oral words from people and the behavior observed by the author through observation, interviews and documentation regarding the development of Human Resources at Raudhatul Ulum Islamic Boarding School through the concept or program of the Directorate of HRD (Human Resources Development) of Raudhatul Ulum Islamic Boarding School. From the research results it is known that the Raudhatul Ulum Islamic Boarding School through Asdir Division (Human Resources Development) has a concept or program that is arranged systematically and planned Making a schedule of ongoing coaching with the qualifications of participants of educators, non-educators, students. Furthermore, monitoring to the evaluation stage of the program being run. The implementation process of Raudhatul Ulum Islamic Boarding School in developing Human Resources went quite well, most of the activities carried out went as planned by the pesantren. Based on the changes in the behavior of the Raudhatul Ulum Islamic Boarding School human resources after participating in a number of coaching activities and the rules applied by the HRD (Human Resources Development) the better, most of them showed good commitment to the pesantren, were able to work with sincerity and complete, have insight about Islam after participating in several activities and coaching.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.028 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".