Pesantren Raudhatul Ulum Dalam Pengembangan Sumber Daya Manusia
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract
 This study aims to determine the concept or program of 
 human resource development at Raudhatul Ulum Islamic
 Boarding School. The method in this research emphasizes
 the type of research file, while this qualitative approach is 
 carried out as a research procedure that produces descriptive 
 data in the form of written or oral words from people and the 
 behavior observed by the author through observation, interviews 
 and documentation regarding the development of Human Resources 
 at Raudhatul Ulum Islamic Boarding School through the concept or
 program of the Directorate of HRD (Human Resources Development) 
 of Raudhatul Ulum Islamic Boarding School. From the research 
 results it is known that the Raudhatul Ulum Islamic Boarding 
 School through Asdir Division (Human Resources Development) 
 has a concept or program that is arranged systematically and 
 planned Making a schedule of ongoing coaching with the
 qualifications of participants of educators, non-educators, 
 students. Furthermore, monitoring to the evaluation 
 stage of the program being run. The implementation process 
 of Raudhatul Ulum Islamic Boarding School in developing Human 
 Resources went quite well, most of the activities carried out went 
 as planned by the pesantren. Based on the changes in the behavior 
 of the Raudhatul Ulum Islamic Boarding School human resources 
 after participating in a number of coaching activities and the rules 
 applied by the HRD (Human Resources Development) the better, most 
 of them showed good commitment to the pesantren, were able to work
 with sincerity and complete, have insight about Islam after participating
 in several activities and coaching.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it