Melt fracture and wall slip of thermoplastic vulcanizates
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Thermoplastic vulcanizates (TPVs) are blends of polypropylene (PP) (thermoplastic phase) and ethylene propylene diene monomer (EPDM) rubber (rubber phase) in which a high content of rubber EPDM is cross‐linked and dispersed in a thermoplastic matrix (PP) in the presence of oil (lubricant) and filler. Depending on the molecular characteristics of the constituent polymers, the level of curing and the amount of cross‐linked rubber, their processing (extrusion) exhibits various difficulties such as melt fracture (extrudate distortions). In this study, a number of different TPVs with various characteristics, including the degree of curing and amount of cross‐linked rubber are examined in capillary extrusion at two different temperatures (190°C and 205°C) relevant to real processing. First, the effect of the temperature on the yield stress is investigated using rheological measurements. Consequently, the flow behavior of the TPVs in capillary flow is studied concluding that TPVs slip massively (nearly plug flow) due to the presence of lubricant and the vulcanized rubber phase. Although there is little slip observed in PP samples, EPDMs themselves exhibit severe slip and melt fracture. As a consequence, the TPV samples essentially follow the slip behavior of EPDMs. Finally, the melt fracture analysis of several TPVs has shown that with increase of temperature and amount of cross‐linked rubber, the severity of TPVs' surface defects increases accordingly.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".