MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3108164646 · doi:10.1002/jeq2.20179

Phosphorus release from intact soil monoliths of manure‐amended fields under simulated snowmelt flooding

2020· article· en· W3108164646 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Angela Concepcion, Darshani Kumaragamage, Wole Akinremi, Saman Dharmakeerthi, Doug Goltz, Srimathie P. Indraratne

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Environmental Quality · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicSoil and Water Nutrient Dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of ManitobaUniversity of Winnipeg
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaU.S. Department of Agriculture
KeywordsSoil waterManureSnowmeltChemistryEnvironmental chemistryAnimal sciencePhosphorusManure managementPaddy fieldAgronomyEnvironmental scienceSurface runoffEcologySoil scienceBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Anaerobic conditions developed in soils with flooding can enhance the release of soil P to overlying water, but little information is available for soils with a long history of manure application. We examined the P release from manure-amended soils under simulated snowmelt flooding. Intact monoliths from manured (solid swine manure [SSM] or liquid swine manure [LSM]) and unamended (control) field plots were collected from Carman, Manitoba. Monoliths were frozen for 7 d, thawed, flooded, and incubated at 4 ± 1 °C. Redox potential, pH, and concentrations of dissolved reactive P (DRP), Ca, Mg, Fe, and Mn in pore water and floodwater were determined weekly up to 56 d after flooding (DAF) and at 84 DAF. Redox potential decreased with DAF with a greater and more rapid decrease in SSM (from ∼300 to <0 mV by 84 DAF) compared with LSM and control (∼100 mV by 84 DAF). Pore water and floodwater DRP concentrations were significantly greater in manured treatments than in the control at all DAFs and in SSM than in LSM for most DAF. Whereas floodwater DRP concentrations remained relatively stable in the control treatment, concentrations in manured treatments increased substantially from the onset of flooding to 35-42 DAF (threefold to fourfold increase) and remained relatively stable thereafter. Significantly greater P release from SSM- than from LSM-treated monoliths was due to greater input of P and the higher organic matter content in SSM-treated soils. These favored the rapid development of anaerobic conditions that further induced P release.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2020
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Environmental QualitySame topicSoil and Water Nutrient DynamicsFrench-language works237,207