MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3108193338 · doi:10.1093/mnras/staa3266

Broad-band radio polarimetry of disc galaxies and AGN with KAT-7

2020· article· en· W3108193338 on OpenAlexaff
L. S. Legodi, A. R. Taylor, J. M. Stil

Bibliographic record

VenueMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicRadio Astronomy Observations and Technology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersNational Research Foundation
KeywordsPhysicsFaraday effectAstrophysicsFaraday cagePolarization (electrochemistry)Active galactic nucleusRadio galaxyGalaxyPolarimetryAstronomyTelescopeLine-of-sightSpectral lineRadio spectrumRedshiftMagnetic fieldOpticsScattering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT We report broad-band (1.2–1.9 GHz) radio continuum observations at arcminute resolutions of two nearby disc galaxies, NGC 1808 and NGC 1097, and four active galactic nuclei (AGN)-powered radio sources: PKS B1934−638, PKS B0407−658, J0240−231, and J0538−440. We use rotation measure synthesis to analyse their Faraday complexity. Observations were made with the seven-dish Karoo Array Telescope (KAT-7) radio telescope array, in South Africa. The AGN-powered sources fall into two ‘Faraday’ categories – simple and complex. The most polarized sources, J0538−440 and J0240−231, are found to have complex Faraday spectra that can be time variable (J0538−440 case) and also indicative of complex Faraday emitting and rotating components along the line of sight. PKS B0407−658 shows a simple Faraday spectrum, while PKS B1934−638 is undetected in polarization. The disc galaxies are classified as complex, albeit at low signal-to-noise ratio. This may indicate depolarization due to turbulence of the magnetized plasma in the bar and circumnuclear regions and/or frequency-dependent depolarization at L band.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.489

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.182
Teacher spread0.176 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical SocietySame topicRadio Astronomy Observations and TechnologyFrench-language works237,207