MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3108258059 · doi:10.1021/acsanm.0c02358

Acid-Triggered Self-Assembled Egg White Protein-Coated Gold Nanoclusters for Selective Fluorescent Detection of Fe<sup>3+</sup>, NO<sub>2</sub><sup>–</sup>, and Cysteine

2020· article· en· W3108258059 on OpenAlexafffund
Wenyan Li, Xiangping Wen, Hemiao Zhao, Wenjun Yan, John F. Trant, Yingqi Li

Bibliographic record

VenueACS Applied Nano Materials · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicNanocluster Synthesis and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsNanoclustersFluorescenceChemistryCysteineNanosensorQuenching (fluorescence)Detection limitBiosensorNitritePhotochemistrySelectivityCombinatorial chemistryNanotechnologyChromatographyMaterials scienceBiochemistryOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Herein, we present a simple and economical synthesis for the first multianalyte probe able to selectively quantify the concentrations of Fe 3+, NO 2 –, and cysteine. It comprises H + -triggered self-assembled gold nanoclusters (AuNCs@EW/H +, AuEHs), showing enhanced red fluorescence at 640 nm. The AuEH is a good fluorescent nanosensor for Fe 3+ and NO 2 – with detection limits of 1.40 and 2.82 nM, respectively. Iron detection, through fluorescence quenching, occurs because of nanocluster aggregation elicited by the complexation of Fe 3+ with amino acids on the surface of AuEH; nitrite detection likely proceeds through fluorescence quenching via the disassembly of the nanoclusters following irreversible oxidation by nitrite. This selectivity is good enough that it can be used to quantify the nitrite concentration in commercially available processed meat. Cysteine detection occurs through the restoration of fluorescence of iron-quenched samples; similar molecules including homocysteine and glutathione are unable to restore fluorescence, showing the specificity of the interaction. Applications, including as a detecting ink and as a biocompatible probe, show promise because of the lack of observable toxicity of the AuEHs, demonstrating their promise as specific and sensitive biosensors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations33
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueACS Applied Nano MaterialsSame topicNanocluster Synthesis and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207