Identification of Web Information using Concept Hierarchies and On-line Updates of Concept Importance
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Internet users have to perform a lot of search to find web pages with relevant information. The paper proposes an approach for utilization of a hierarchy of concepts to perform identification of web pages in the environment of the Semantic Web. A user provides a hierarchy of concepts that can only partially cover their domain of interest. Ontologies related to that domain are used to instantiate the hierarchy with concrete information, as well as to enhance it with new concepts initially unknown to the user. A web page is checked against concepts from the hierarchy and activation levels of those concepts are aggregated using Ordered Weighted Averaging (OWA) operators that are part of the hierarchy of concepts. Mechanisms of aggregations embedded in OWA operators are determined using linguistic quantifiers and importance of concepts. The importance of concepts is constantly changing, and in order to automatically assign importance values and keep track of changes a new algorithm for Adaptive Assigning of Term Importance (AATI) is used. Keywords—hierarchy of concepts, ontology, ordered weighted aggregation, text identification
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it