MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3108487005 · doi:10.1142/9789811226830_0002

Improving Handwritten Signatures Fluency via the Lognormality Principle

2020· book-chapter· en· W3108487005 on OpenAlexaff
Moises Díaz, Miguel A. Ferrer, Cristina Carmona-Duarte, Réjean Plamondon

Bibliographic record

VenueSeries in machine perception and artificial intelligence · 2020
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicEdcuational Technology Systems
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFluencyComputer sciencePsychologyMathematics education

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This chapter proposes two efficient methods to modify the fluency of dynamic signatures. The main idea is to modify the number of velocity minima or virtual target points and reconstruct the signature with the new virtual target points. If the number of virtual target points is reduced, the fluency is improved, and vice versa. The modification of the virtual target points is accomplished initially by linking the samples of an on-line signature by 8-connected Bresenham’s lines to obtain the interpolated trajectory. Then, the most perceptually important points are estimated from the corners in the trajectory. To this end, two methods are proposed. The first method, which we term resampling-wise, develops a lognormal synthetic velocity profile used for resampling the static trajectory. The second method, recovering-wise, consists in estimating the virtual target points from the perceptually important points in the trajectory, linking them by circular trajectories, and reconstructing the dynamic trajectory. Additionally, both methods can be used to generate synthetic on-line signatures from static trajectories. Both methods’ efficiency has been tested in automatic signature verification by increasing skilled forgeries’ fluidity with the proposed methods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSeries in machine perception and artificial intelligenceSame topicEdcuational Technology SystemsFrench-language works237,207