MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3108661947 · doi:10.1017/jfm.2021.872

Flow-excited membrane instability at moderate Reynolds numbers

2021· preprint· en· W3108661947 on OpenAlexafffund
Guojun Li, Rajeev K. Jaiman, Boo Cheong Khoo

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Fluid Mechanics · 2021
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicBiomimetic flight and propulsion mechanisms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational University of Singapore
KeywordsReynolds numberMechanicsAeroelasticityVortex sheddingPhysicsAdded massFluid–structure interactionNatural frequencyInviscid flowControl theory (sociology)VibrationClassical mechanicsTurbulenceComputer scienceAerodynamicsAcousticsThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we study the fluid–structure interaction of a three-dimensional (3-D) flexible membrane immersed in an unsteady separated flow at moderate Reynolds numbers. We employ a body-conforming variational fluid–structure interaction solver based on the recently developed partitioned iterative scheme for the coupling of turbulent fluid flow with nonlinear structural dynamics. Of particular interest is to understand the flow-excited instability of a 3-D flexible membrane as a function of the non-dimensional mass ratio ( $m^{*}$ ), Reynolds number ( $Re$ ) and aeroelastic number ( $Ae$ ). For a wide range of parameters, we examine two distinct stability regimes of the fluid–membrane interaction: deformed steady state (DSS) and dynamic balance state (DBS). We propose stability phase diagrams to demarcate the DSS and DBS regimes for the parameter space of mass ratio versus Reynolds number ( $m^{*}$ - $Re$ ) and mass ratio versus aeroelastic number ( $m^{*}$ - $Ae$ ). With the aid of the global Fourier mode decomposition technique, the distinct dominant vibrational modes are identified from the intertwined membrane responses in the parameter space of $m^{*}$ - $Re$ and $m^{*}$ - $Ae$ . Compared to the deformed steady membrane, the flow-excited vibration produces relatively longer attached leading-edge vortices which improve the aerodynamic performance when the coupled system is near the flow-excited instability boundary. The optimal aerodynamic performance is achieved for lighter membranes with higher $Re$ and larger flexibility. Based on the global aeroelastic mode analysis, we observe a frequency lock-in phenomenon between the vortex-shedding frequency and the membrane vibration frequency causing self-sustained vibrations in the dynamic balance state. To characterize the origin of the frequency lock-in, we propose an approximate analytical formula for the nonlinear natural frequency by considering the added mass effect and employing a large deflection theory for a simply supported rectangular membrane. Through our systematic high-fidelity numerical investigation, we find that the onset of the membrane vibration and the mode transition has a direct dependence on the frequency lock-in between the natural frequency of the tensioned membrane and the vortex-shedding frequency or its harmonics. These findings on the fluid-elastic instability of membranes have implications for the design and development of control strategies for membrane wing-based unmanned systems and drones.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Fluid MechanicsSame topicBiomimetic flight and propulsion mechanismsFrench-language works237,207