Sex differences in survival: viability selection in nymphal tree crickets from a conopid fly parasitoid
Bibliographic record
Abstract
1. Variation in mortality due to parasitoids is expected to be affected by host sex and size. 2. We use selection analyses to examine the effects of Stylogaster neglecta (Diptera: Conopidae), a recently discovered parasitoid of nymphal Oecanthus nigricornis (Orthoptera: Gryllidae), on sex and size viability in the host crickets . 3. O. nigricornis nymphs were sampled across Ontario and New York State and dissected to determine whether they were parasitised. Logistic regression was used to examine parasitism by host body size and sex. 4. There was strong evidence for an effect of sex and body size on parasitism, with males and smaller crickets being more likely to be parasitised and containing more parasitoids in them. There was also weaker evidence of an interaction effect between sex and body size, with body size being a significant predictor of parasitism only in males. Using a selection analysis, we found evidence of positive and disruptive selection on male body size. 5. Causes of these viability differences may include sex differences in larval cricket immune function, riskier behaviour of male nymphs as they acquire resources necessary for adult trait development, as well as the effects of S. neglecta flies targeting hosts that maximise fitness.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".