MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3108788545 · doi:10.1016/j.cjco.2020.11.011

Infertility and the Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: Findings From the Study of Women’s Health Across the Nation (SWAN)

2020· article· en· W3108788545 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCJC Open · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOvarian function and disorders
Canadian institutionsAlberta Kidney Disease NetworkLibin Cardiovascular Institute of AlbertaUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineInfertilityHazard ratioProportional hazards modelPregnancyMyocardial infarctionFertilityConfidence intervalObstetricsDiseaseCohort studyMetabolic syndromeFemale infertilityGynecologyInternal medicineObesityPopulationEnvironmental health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of death in women globally. In recent years, attention has turned to infertility and pregnancy-related events as potential markers for early mortality and future CVD. METHODS: The Study of Women's Health Across the Nation (SWAN) is an ongoing longitudinal cohort study of women's health. Women aged 42-52 years with a uterus and ≤ 1 intact ovary, a menstrual period, and no hormone medications within 3 months before enrollment were eligible. Infertility was self-reported and defined as the inability to achieve pregnancy after 12 months of trying to conceive, or use of fertility medications for > 1 month. Outcomes included development of metabolic syndrome over a 7-year follow-up, and any atherosclerotic CVD event (ie, stroke, angina, myocardial infarction) over a 10-year follow-up. Cox proportional hazards models were used to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) for metabolic syndrome and CVD events in participants with infertility, with adjustment for relevant covariates. Participants without infertility were used as the comparison group. RESULTS: We included 2370 participants in the analysis of metabolic syndrome risk, and 2809 participants were included in the analysis of CVD event risk. Participants with self-reported infertility did not have a higher risk of developing metabolic syndrome (HR, 0.91; 95% confidence interval, 0.71-1.15) or experiencing CVD events (HR, 0.79; 95% confidence interval, 0.52-1.21) after adjusting for relevant covariates. CONCLUSIONS: Infertility was not associated with development of metabolic syndrome or CVD events in women; further research is required to investigate the effects of specific causes of infertility and fertility treatments on CVD outcomes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.215
Threshold uncertainty score0.920

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it