MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3108869712 · doi:10.1093/ehjci/ehaa946.3407

Being married/having an intimate partner/being has protective effects for mild cognitive impairment in acute coronary syndrome patients

2020· article· en· W3108869712 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Robyn Gallagher, Emma Zhao, Sharon L. Naismith, Geoffrey H. Tofler, Arthur W. Bauman

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Heart Journal · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAcute coronary syndromeMontreal Cognitive AssessmentNeurocognitiveUnstable anginaInternal medicineMyocardial infarctionCognitionCognitive impairmentVerbal learningPediatricsPhysical therapyDiseasePsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is a leading cause of mortality and morbidity and is known to contribute to cognitive impairment, a condition common in CVD patients. Cognitive impairment (CI) is important to detect, manage and accommodate because it limits the capacity of CVD patients to learn about secondary prevention and engage in appropriate self-care including lifestyle change. Purpose Therefore this study aimed to determine the prevalence and predictors of cognitive impairment in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients during hospital admission. Methods ACS (myocardial infarction, unstable angina) inpatients (n=81) who did not have a neurocognitive diagnosis were recruited to a prospective descriptive study in 2019. Cognitive performance was assessed using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test (HVLT). Results The sample had an age mean of 63.49±10.86 (range 40–89) years, was mostly male (82.7%) and 50.6% were university educated. MI occurred in 56.8%, equally STEMI (28.4%) and nSTEMI (28.4%) with 70.4% treated by coronary intervention. The mean education adjusted MOCA score was 25.73±3.05 (range 18–31) and 48.1% were classified as having mild CI (18–26). The domain with the worst performance was delayed recall/memory domain at mean 2.58±1.77 (of potential 0–5 points). The mean unadjusted recall score on HVLT was 19.56±6.18 (range 0–32), the mean z-score −0.69±1.21 (range −4.59–1.87) and 40.7% were classified as having mild CI (age and education adjusted Z-score ≥−1). Mild CI was classified by both MOCA and HVLT (both adjusted) in 24.7%. Patients classified as having mild CI (MOCA) were significantly older (66.87 versus 60.36 years, p=0.006) and less likely and to be married or have an intimate partner (21% versus 32% p=0.039). When all factors were taken into account using multiple linear regression, higher MOCA scores in patients who were married/partnered (B=1.6) and lower scores with advancing age (B=−0.08). Conclusions Mild CI and decreased delayed recall is prevalent in ACS patients and patient education strategies need to be accommodate this. Being married/partnered may have protective effects, therefore additional support may need to be directed to single patients. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Public grant(s) – National budget only. Main funding source(s): National Heart Foundation of Australia Vanguard Award

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.023

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.334
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Heart Journal→Same topicDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research→French-language works237,207→