MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Excitonic and Valley-Polarization Signatures of Fractional Correlated Electronic Phases in a <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>WSe</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>WS</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math> Moiré Superlattice

2021· article· lv· W3108873362 on OpenAlexaff
Erfu Liu, Takashi Taniguchi, Kenji Watanabe, Nathaniel M. Gabor, Yong‐Tao Cui, Chun Hung Lui

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review Letters · 2021
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldMaterials Science
Topic2D Materials and Applications
Canadian institutionsCanadian Institute for Advanced Research
FundersArmy Research OfficeCore Research for Evolutional Science and TechnologyMinistry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and TechnologyDivision of Materials ResearchJapan Science and Technology AgencyNational Science Foundation
KeywordsSuperlatticePhotoluminescenceExcitonPolarization (electrochemistry)PhysicsAbsorption (acoustics)Condensed matter physicsMaterials scienceOpticsChemistryPhysical chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We have measured the reflectance contrast, photoluminescence, and valley polarization of a WSe_{2}/WS_{2} heterobilayer moiré superlattice at gate-tunable charge density. We observe absorption modulation of three intralayer moiré excitons at filling factors ν=1/3 and 2/3. We also observe luminescence modulation of interlayer trions at around a dozen fractional filling factors, including ν=-3/2, 1/4, 1/3, 2/5, 2/3, 6/7, 5/3. Remarkably, the valley polarization of interlayer trions is suppressed at some fractional fillings. These results demonstrate that electron crystallization can modulate the absorption, emission, and valley dynamics of the excitonic states in a moiré superlattice.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations85
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review LettersSame topic2D Materials and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207