MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3109042685 · doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.0c00904

Benchmarking Force Field and the ANI Neural Network Potentials for the Torsional Potential Energy Surface of Biaryl Drug Fragments

2020· article· en· W3109042685 on OpenAlexafffund
Shae-Lynn Lahey, Từ Nguyễn Thiên Phúc, Christopher N. Rowley

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Chemical Information and Modeling · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicComputational Drug Discovery Methods
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsBenchmarkingForce field (fiction)Field (mathematics)Artificial neural networkSurface (topology)Potential energy surfaceComputer scienceComputational biologyArtificial intelligenceChemistryBiologyMathematicsMoleculeBusinessOrganic chemistryGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Many drug molecules contain biaryl fragments, resulting in a torsional barrier corresponding to rotation around the bond linking the aryls. The potential energy surfaces of these torsions vary significantly because of steric and electronic effects, ultimately affecting the relative stability of the molecular conformations in the protein-bound and solution states. Simulations of protein–ligand binding require accurate computational models to represent the intramolecular interactions to provide accurate predictions of the structure and dynamics of binding. In this article, we compare four force fields [generalized AMBER force field (GAFF), open force field (OpenFF), CHARMM general force field (CGenFF), optimized potentials for liquid simulations (OPLS)] and two neural network potentials (ANI-2x and ANI-1ccx) for their ability to predict the torsional potential energy surfaces of 88 biaryls extracted from drug fragments. The root mean square deviation (rmsd) over the full potential energy surface and the mean absolute deviation of the torsion rotational barrier height (MADB) relative to high-level ab initio reference data (CCSD(T1)*) were used as the measure of accuracy. Uncertainties in these metrics due to the composition of the data set were estimated using bootstrap analysis. In comparison to high-level ab initio data, ANI-1ccx was most accurate for predicting the barrier height (rmsd: 0.5 ± 0.0 kcal/mol, MADB: 0.8 ± 0.1 kcal/mol), followed closely by ANI-2x (rmsd: 0.5 ± 0.0 kcal/mol, MADB: 1.0 ± 0.2 kcal/mol), then CGenFF (rmsd: 0.8 ± 0.1 kcal/mol, MADB: 1.3 ± 0.1 kcal/mol) and OpenFF (rmsd: 0.7 ± 0.1 kcal/mol, MADB: 1.3 ± 0.1 kcal/mol), then GAFF (rmsd: 1.2 ± 0.2 kcal/mol, MADB: 2.6 ± 0.5 kcal/mol), and finally OPLS (rmsd: 3.6 ± 0.3 kcal/mol, MADB: 3.6 ± 0.3 kcal/mol). Significantly, the neural network potentials (NNPs) are systematically more accurate and more reliable than any of the force fields. As a practical example, the NNP/molecular mechanics method was used to simulate the isomerization of ozanimod, a drug used for multiple sclerosis. Multinanosecond molecular dynamics (MD) simulations in an explicit aqueous solvent were performed, as well as umbrella sampling and adaptive biasing force-enhanced sampling techniques. The rate constant for this isomerization calculated using transition state theory was 4.30 × 10 –1 ns –1, which is consistent with direct MD simulations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations39
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Chemical Information and ModelingSame topicComputational Drug Discovery MethodsFrench-language works237,207