MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3109137557 · doi:10.1109/tii.2020.3041159

Intelligent-Driven Green Resource Allocation for Industrial Internet of Things in 5G Heterogeneous Networks

2020· article· en· W3109137557 on OpenAlexaff
Peng Yu, Mo Yang, Ao Xiong, Yahui Ding, Wenjing Li, Xuesong Qiu, Luoming Meng, Michel Kadoch, Mohamed Cheriet

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicIoT and Edge/Fog Computing
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie SupérieureUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceResource allocationReinforcement learningResource management (computing)Quality of serviceDistributed computingReliability (semiconductor)Industrial InternetResource (disambiguation)The InternetAsynchronous communicationComputer networkArtificial intelligenceInternet of ThingsComputer securityWorld Wide Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) is one of the important applications under the 5G massive machine type of communication (mMTC) scenario. To ensure the high reliability of IIoT services, it is necessary to apply an efficient resource allocation method under the dynamic and complex environment. In view of the absence of energy-efficient resource management architecture for the entire network, this article proposes an intelligent-driven green resource allocation mechanism for the IIoT under 5G heterogeneous networks. First, an intelligent end-to-end self-organizing resource allocation framework for IIoT service is given. Next, an energy-efficient resource allocation model within the framework is proposed. It is then solved by an intelligent mechanism with the asynchronous advantage actor critic driven deep reinforcement learning algorithm. Through the comparison analysis of different methods and rewards under IIoT scenarios with proper parameters setting, the proposed method can achieve better performance than other traditional deep learning (DL) methods and maintain service quality above accepted levels as well.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.084
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.174 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations70
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Industrial InformaticsSame topicIoT and Edge/Fog ComputingFrench-language works237,207