Bibliographic record
Abstract
We move research creation by inventing with neurodiversity. Neurodiversity is relation. This moves autism away from the concept of dis-order and as non-relational and we untether from the pathology paradigm to express and language otherwise. As Adam Wolfond, my non-speaking son and collaborator suggests, this is a new way of “languaging” neurodiversity through art and movement to consider the question: “can a good body feel without another body?” to address concepts of independence and agency as it is imagined by neurotypicality. This latter way forces a particular narrative and art form largely for the purposes of explaining experience rather than being immersed within it. We feel this film is also important for thinking about support and movement as mutuated and affective. The film S/Pace (Wolfond and Klar, 2019) emerged from a collaboration, thinking about the conditions to support neurodiversity. We “think with sticks,” (Wolfond), rubber bath toys, tics, flaps, taps, space, pace and proprioception. Wolfond’s interest in perception, movement and support with the human and non-human became part of a processual artistic practice we have named intraethnography, and the film merged Wolfond’s poetry with movement in the art studio and on walks for a new way of research-creation. We contend that this processual-artistic way of invention allows us to remain open, without goal and directive, letting movement, relation and creation unfold to think of what we may not have yet conceived. We extend the idea of autistic narrative towards artistic experimentation and relational expression to “blast” (Wolfond) form, inspired by Melanie Yergeau’s call to “queer the lines of rhetoric, humanity and agency” (Yergeau, 2018, 25). We question notions around authorship and intelligibility that enforces a dominant neurotypical body and form; a form that is largely instrumental and directional. We propose the notions of relation and support as mutual, and also, incorporeal (non-human and affective) thereby eliding the false binary between dis/abled in what is traditionally conceived as the support dyad. Rethinking “orientation”, a motional-relational attunement is instead perpetually aligning-moving-pacing, requiring practices and techniques that put form and its neurotypical “legibility” into question. We therefore imagine new forms of neurodiverse expression. This film was presented as an installation with Wolfond’s “poetry sticks” at Critical Distance Centre for Curators, Toronto, Canada, in October, 2019. Film Link: https://vimeo.com/363876394 Film Duration: 13 minutes. Keywords: Art, Autism, Intraethnography, Neurodiversity, Research Creation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.033 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.012 | 0.015 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.007 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.007 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".