MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3109354498 · doi:10.3138/seminar.57.1.4

No Light against Entropy: Elfriede Jelinek’s Translation of Thomas Pynchon’s <i>Gravity’s Rainbow</i> and Its Impact on <i>Die Kinder der Toten</i>

2020· article· en· W3109354498 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Dorothea Rebecca Schönsee

Bibliographic record

VenueSeminar A Journal of Germanic Studies · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicContemporary Literature and Criticism
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRainbowPoetryAgency (philosophy)ArtLiteratureArt historyPhilosophyEpistemologyPhysicsOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Elfriede Jelinek’s unique translation of the title of Thomas Pynchon’s Gravity’s Rainbow (1973) as Die Enden der Parabel (1976, 1981) is representative of the ways in which the Austrian author developed Pynchon’s imagery in her work. In shifting focus to the twofold meaning of parable and parabola, her translation becomes an intervention. The present article traces Pynchon’s impact on Jelinek’s writing, in particular on Die Kinder der Toten (1995). The article argues that Jelinek engages in a poetic exploration of reclaimed agency in an entropic environment; this is an exploration in which Pynchon’s iridescent parables play a pivotal role as agents of self-awareness acting against entropy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.037

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.018
Scholarly communication0.0040.004
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSeminar A Journal of Germanic StudiesSame topicContemporary Literature and CriticismFrench-language works237,207