Effects of high oil viscosity on oil‐gas downward flow in deviated pipes. Part 1: Experimental setup and flow pattern transitions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract This work provides new experimental data on high viscosity oil‐gas flow. A set of 170 downward flow experiments were carried out using a mixture of air and mineral oil (213 mPa · s, 50.8 mm internal diameter, 21.5 m long) for five different elevations: −45°, −60°, −70°, −80°, and −85°. Superficial liquid and gas velocities varied from 0.05 m/s to 0.7 m/s and 0.7 m/s to 7 m/s, respectively. Flow pattern transitions were identified and analyzed. The results helped to evaluate the effects of pipe inclination and liquid viscosity on the stratified‐annular transition, as well as the characterization of subclasses of annular flow pattern, named falling film, liquid slip, and wavy annular. Based on the experimental evidence, the study proposes a constant liquid‐fraction value as a transition between liquid slip and wavy annular flow patterns. A comparison of the present data with the flow pattern predictions of the available models were made. Results show disagreements, which justifies the need for a detailed study of the effects of viscosity and the inclination of the pipe in liquid‐gas downward flow mixtures.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".