MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3109398544 · doi:10.1109/tsg.2020.3039259

RTCE: Real-Time Co-Emulation Framework for EMT-Based Power System and Communication Network on FPGA-MPSoC Hardware Architecture

2020· article· en· W3109398544 on OpenAlexafffund
Tong Duan, Zhen Huang, Venkata Dinavahi

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Smart Grid · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicReal-time simulation and control systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMPSoCEmulationHardware emulationEmbedded systemField-programmable gate arrayComputer scienceSoftwareComputer architectureSystem on a chipOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With the expansion of smart grid infrastructure world-wide, modeling the interaction between power systems and communication networks becomes paramount and has created a new challenge of co-simulating the two domains before commissioning. Existing co-simulation methods mostly concentrate on the off-line software-level interface design to synchronize messages between the simulators of both domains. Instead of simulating in software with a large latency, this article proposes a novel real-time co-emulation (RTCE) framework on FPGA-MPSoC based hardware architecture for a more practical emulation of real-world cyber-physical systems. The discrete-time based power system electromagnetic transient (EMT) emulation is executed in programmable hardware units so that the transient-level behaviour can be captured in real-time, while the discrete-event based communication network emulation is modeled in abstraction-level or directly executed on the hardware PHY and network ports of the FPGA-MPSoC platform, which can perform the communication networking in real-time. The data exchange between two domains is handled within each platform with an extremely low latency, which is sufficiently fast for real-time interaction; and the multi-board scheme is deployed to practically emulate the communication between different power system areas. The hardware resource cost and emulation latency for the test system and case studies are evaluated to demonstrate the validity and effectiveness of the proposed RTCE framework.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.025

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Smart GridSame topicReal-time simulation and control systemsFrench-language works237,207