MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3109468078 · doi:10.1093/ehjci/ehaa946.2354

Microvascular disease, peripheral artery disease, and the risk of lower limb amputation

2020· article· en· W3109468078 on OpenAlexaff
Kevin Kris Warnakula Olesen, Sonia S. Anand, Christine Gyldenkerne, Troels Thim, Michael Mæng

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Heart Journal · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPeripheral Artery Disease Management
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversityPopulation Health Research Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAmputationVascular diseasePopulationHazard ratioClaudicationSurgeryInternal medicineIntermittent claudicationCritical limb ischemiaArterial diseaseConfidence interval

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Peripheral artery disease (PAD) is the leading cause of non-traumatic lower limb amputation. Microvascular disease (peripheral neuropathy, nephropathy, or retinopathy) increases the risk of lower limb amputation in patients with established PAD. Purpose We estimated risk of lower limb amputation associated with microvascular disease and PAD in a Danish cohort. Methods We conducted a population-based cohort study of every person living in Western Denmark aged 50–75 years on January 1, 2012 and followed them for 7 years. People with previous lower limb amputation were excluded. People were stratified by the presence of microvascular disease (peripheral neuropathy, nephropathy, or retinopathy) and PAD (peripheral atherosclerosis including intermittent claudication, or previous lower limb revascularization). We estimated the 7-year cumulative incidence and hazard ratio (HR) of lower limb amputation using individuals with neither microvascular disease nor PAD as reference. We also provide a sex-specific analyses and estimated the population attributable fraction of amputation associated with male sex. Results We included 933,597 individuals, of whom 16,007 had microvascular disease, 18,400 had PAD, and 1,789 had both microvascular disease and PAD. Patients with either microvascular disease (3.7%) or PAD (3.9%) had similar unadjusted 7-year risks of lower limb amputation (Figure). Microvascular disease (adjusted HR 3.21, 95% CI 2.86–3.59) and PAD (adjusted HR 7.37, 95% CI 6.68–8.14) increased the risk of lower limb amputation separately in adjusted analysis. Individuals with both microvascular disease and PAD had the highest risk of amputation (adjusted HR 11.82, 95% CI 10.11–13.80). While the relative impact of microvascular disease and PAD were similar in men and women, men had increased risk of amputation compared to women, in absolute terms. The population attributable fraction of amputations associated with male sex was 31%. Conclusion Microvascular disease and PAD are independently associated with a 3-fold and 7-fold increase of amputation rate, respectively. Combined, microvascular disease and PAD had an additive effect constituting a 12-fold amputation risk. Amputation risk was higher in men than in women, with 3 in 10 lower limb amputations in Western Denmark attributable to male sex. Figure 1 Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Public hospital(s). Main funding source(s): Department of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.207
Threshold uncertainty score0.418

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Heart JournalSame topicPeripheral Artery Disease ManagementFrench-language works237,207