MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3109815911 · doi:10.1016/j.dsp.2020.102912

The smooth variable structure filter: A comprehensive review

2020· review· en· W3109815911 on OpenAlexafffund
Mohammad Avzayesh, Mamoun F. Abdel–Hafez, Mohammad Al‐Shabi, S. Andrew Gadsden

Bibliographic record

VenueDigital Signal Processing · 2020
Typereview
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicTarget Tracking and Data Fusion in Sensor Networks
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaAmerican University of Sharjah
KeywordsRobustness (evolution)Kalman filterControl theory (sociology)Mean squared errorVariable (mathematics)MathematicsComputer scienceStatisticsControl (management)Artificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The smooth variable structure filter (SVSF) is a type of sliding mode filter formulated in a predictor-corrector format and has seen significant development over the last 15 years. In this paper, we provide a comprehensive review of the SVSF and its variants. The developments, applications and improvements of the SVSF in terms of robustness and optimality are investigated. In addition, the combination of the SVSF with different filtering strategies is considered in an effort to improve estimation accuracy while maintaining robustness to model uncertainty. State estimation techniques such as the unscented and cubature Kalman filters (UKF & CKF), SVSF, the combination of SVSF with UKF (UK-SVSF), and the combination of CKF with SVSF (CK-SVSF) are applied on a 4-DOF industrial robotic arm. The SVSF state estimation performance is examined under different operating conditions. The results of these filters have been compared based a number of statistics such as the root mean squared error (RMSE) and mean absolute error (MAE), among others. It is shown that the UK-SVSF and CK-SVSF strategies acquire the best performance in the presence of uncertainties.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations64
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDigital Signal ProcessingSame topicTarget Tracking and Data Fusion in Sensor NetworksFrench-language works237,207