Bibliographic record
Abstract
Despite decades of litigation, residents of the Oriente region of Ecuador have been unable to force remediation of, or compensation for, massive pollution from oil development in the 1970s. In 1993 the residents sued Texaco, later acquired by Chevron, in US federal court. In 2002 the US court accepted the oil company’s argument that the case should be heard in Ecuador and dismissed it on condition that the company submit to jurisdiction of Ecuador’s courts. In 2003 the litigation was refiled in Ecuador where a court in 2011 awarded plaintiffs a $8.6 billion judgment against Chevron. By pulling its assets out of Ecuador and pursuing a ‘scorched earth’ litigation strategy to demonize the plaintiffs and their lawyers, Chevron has prevented collection of the judgment. A US court has blocked enforcement by finding that plaintiffs and their lawyers were engaged in fraud. Courts in Argentina, Brazil and Canada have held that Chevron’s subsidiaries in their countries are not responsible for the parent corporation’s debts. The case illustrates how difficult it is to hold multinational corporations accountable for environmental harm in developing countries.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.008 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".