MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3109970185 · doi:10.1109/iai50351.2020.9262172

Pre-processing for UAV Based Wildfire Detection: A Loss U-net Enhanced GAN for Image Restoration

2020· article· en· W3109970185 on OpenAlexaff
Linhan Qiao, Youmin Zhang, Yaohong Qu

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicImage Enhancement Techniques
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDiscriminatorComputer scienceFeature (linguistics)Net (polyhedron)Simulated annealingArtificial intelligenceGenerator (circuit theory)Real-time computingAlgorithmDetectorTelecommunicationsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, a U-net with feature loss enhanced generative adversarial network (GAN) is designed for the wildfire or smoke images restoration which is captured by unmanned aerial vehicles in a serious environment. Based on the concepts of GAN, feature loss, and fastai API, we firstly crappy the target images, and train a U-net architecture based generator, then load the adaptive loss of discriminator and the mean square error together to train the GAN model. After the GAN, a second U-net grabs the feature loss from an Imagenet pre-trained loss network to generate the GAN output images with one more step. This U-net enhanced the generator of GAN and helped to get the main features in human conception. Comparing with other restoration methods, this model used the adaptive loss to train the GAN and perceptual loss to train the next U-net. Learning rate with simulation annealing helped jumping out of the local minimum. The result proved the good performance of this model.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.570
Threshold uncertainty score0.610

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicImage Enhancement TechniquesFrench-language works237,207