The Process of Creating and Disseminating Exercise Programs by Physical Therapists for Older Adults With Chronic Back Pain
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to enhance the understanding of the process that physical therapists undertake when creating and disseminating exercise programs for older adults with chronic backpain. METHODS: Constructivist grounded theory methodology was used as an accessible mode of researching pragmatic clinical practices. Physical therapists from outpatient, ambulatory care clinic settings participated in in-depth, individual interviews (n = 9) and in-clinic observations (n = 5). Data collection and analysis were iterative processes. Codes were generated based on recurrent themes, and constant comparative analysis was used to compare data. Analysis and data collection were concluded when theoretical sufficiency was reached. RESULTS: Physical therapist participants described the process of creating and implementing exercise plans as involving listening to the patient's story, determining function, physical therapy care, supported integration, and, ultimately, returning back to living and life with chronic back pain. Participants worked through the 5 phases at different rates, often recurrently, when treating older adults with chronic back pain. The phases are positioned within a shared alliance between physical therapy provider and patient, with a transfer of responsibility occurring throughout treatment and follow-up sessions, progressing toward patient independence. This transfer of responsibility served as the core category for the process herein. CONCLUSIONS: This research highlights the importance of listening to patients' stories when engaging in physical therapy care. Focusing on function, providing education and exercise as components of care, and supporting integration of exercise into everyday life are considerations for providing care for older adults with chronic back pain in physical therapist practice and, ultimately, for returning tolife. IMPACT: With aging populations and with the increasing prevalence of chronic conditions, this research offers insight into a process for physical therapists to enact exercise engagement for improved health and quality of life for older adults with chronic backpain.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".