MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Percepções de pessoas em sofrimento psíquico acerca do restabelecimento da trajetória de vida

2020· article· pt· W3110088760 on OpenAlexaff
Cláudio Luí­s de Souza Santos, Patrick Leonardo Nogueira da Silva, Fábio Batista Miranda, Ana Patrí­cia Fonseca Coelho Galvão, Valdira Vieira de Oliveira, Carolina dos Reis Alves

Bibliographic record

VenueNursing Edição Brasileira · 2020
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldPsychology
TopicPsychology and Mental Health
Canadian institutionsCanadian Association of Nurses in Oncology
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPsychologyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objetivo: identificar as percepções de pessoas em sofrimento psí­quico acerca da vivência da doença e do restabelecimento da trajetória de vida. Método: estudo descritivo, exploratório, com abordagem qualitativa, realizado com nove usuários cadastrados numa equipe de Saúde da Famí­lia. Utilizou-se uma entrevista semiestruturada como instrumento de coleta de dados. Os depoimentos foram gravados, transcritos na í­ntegra, categorizados e discutidos por meio de Análise de Conteúdo. Resultados: o processo de aceitação do sofrimento psí­quico é um componente central da recuperação e encontra-se intimamente relacionada ao funcionamento, ao manejo da doença e í qualidade de vida.Também foi evidenciados mecanismos de empoderamento e enfrentamento para restabelecimento da vida cotidiana como a busca por apoio religioso, apoio familiar e as atividades de apoio comunitário com ações de suporte.Conclusão: ser portador de sofrimento psí­quico é vivenciar um sofrimento diário, tendo assim várias limitações para realizar suas atividades cotidianas.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.630
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.084
GPT teacher head0.413
Teacher spread0.329 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNursing Edição BrasileiraSame topicPsychology and Mental HealthFrench-language works237,207