Effects of Exercise on Resilience, Insight and Functionality in Patients with Chronic Schizophrenia in a Psychiatric Nursing Home Setting: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To our knowledge, there are no studies on the effects of exercise in patients with severe schizophrenia-related disability or in nursing home settings. Again, the literature search on the influence of exercise on insight and resilience gives no results except mind-body exercises. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of exercise on psychotic symptoms, depression, functionality, insight and resilience in patients with severe schizophrenia-related disability living in nursing home setting. Thirty-nine patients with schizophrenia were recruited. Exercise group with 20 patients who continued resistance exercise for 60 min, 2 days a week, for 3 months; and treatment as usual (TAU) group with 19 patients. All patients were administered Scale for the Assessment of Positive Symptoms, Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS), Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia (CDSS), Schedule for Assessment of Insight (SAI), Functional Remission of General Schizophrenia Scale (FROGS), Resilience Scale for Adults (RSA) at baseline and 3 months after. There were no significant differences between the groups for baseline and third month scores. In both groups significant decrease in SANS scores, significant increase in scores of FROGS total and social functioning, daily life skills subscale and RSA perception of the self were observed. In exercise group, significant decrease in CDSS scores, and significant increase in SAI awareness of illness, FROGS health and treatment, occupational functioning scores were found. Exercise combined with TAU may be effective in increasing awareness of illness and alleviating depression in chronic schizophrenia.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".