Geochemical Variation and Environmental Assessment of Uranium in the Soil Profile and Ground Water for Kirkuk City/ Northern Iraq
Bibliographic record
Abstract
15) sample for the second depth (QB), in addition to (7) sample for ground water (GW) .Inductively Coupled Plasma - Mass Spectrometry (ICP-MS) technology has been used to measure the concentration of Uranium and other elements in these environments by laboratories of Acme company in Canada. The results showed that the average of uranium concentration in the first depth of soil (QA) was (1.672 ppm), and the second depth (QB) was (1.373 ppm), with increasing in surface depth more than the sub surface. The results showed that the average concentration of uranium in the groundwater was (4.256 ppb), and its concentration is less than the permitted values average of ground water (30 ppb). The environmental assessment study of uranium showed that the values of (Igeo) for soil sample occurs within the type uncontaminated to moderately contaminated, and the (CF) is classified as low contamination, while (EF) is reached within type deficiently to minimal enrichment. Size fraction for soil samples showed that the highest uranium concentration occurs in the clay fraction more than silt and sand fractions, respectively.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".