Single-Stage Hybrid Energy Storage Integration in Electric Vehicles Using Vector Controlled Power Sharing
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The dual inverter topology driving an open-winding motor is well known in high voltage motor drive applications. This structure allows two energy sources to be directly connected to an open-winding motor. This enables the integration of supercapacitors into a battery electric vehicle (EV). Unlike existing solutions, this article demonstrates dynamic power sharing between the dual energy sources by controlling the active and reactive voltages of the twin inverters, thus enabling the use of the supercapacitor for either active power assist and/or reactive power assist. The dedicated vector-controlled power sharing method and energy management is shown to achieve power sharing in the dual inverter drive integrating a battery and supercapacitor, thereby eliminating the need for an additional cascaded dc/dc converter to extract/supply energy to the supercapacitor. It also enables improved efficiency by eliminating switching losses in the supercapacitor inverter during low power operation. The proposed voltage vector splitting method is also shown to achieve battery-to-supercapacitor power exchange for regulating the net energy in the supercapacitor without affecting motor operation. A laboratory prototype utilizing a 110-kW liquid-cooled EV motor and supercapacitor bank is developed to verify the practical implementation of the power and energy management strategy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".