MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3110357963 · doi:10.22215/etd/2019-13802

Regulation of NMDA Receptor Subtypes in Pain Processing Neurons within Lamina I of the Spinal Cord

2019· dissertation· en· W3110357963 on OpenAlexaff
Christopher Dedek

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPain Mechanisms and Treatments
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNMDA receptorLong-term potentiationNeuroscienceSpinal cordChemistryExcitatory postsynaptic potentialReceptorBiologyBiochemistryInhibitory postsynaptic potential

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Chronic pain is a condition affecting 18.9% of Canadians over the age of 18 (Schopflocher et al., 2011).Despite the prevalence of chronic pain, there are currently no effective and safe treatment options.In lamina I of the spinal cord dorsal horn, excitatory Nmethyl-D-aspartate receptors (NMDARs) that contain the GluN2B subunit are phosphorylated and potentiated by Src family kinase (SFK) through BDNF signalling in chronic pain models.However, the contribution of GluN2B to synaptic responses in the brain makes it a difficult target to specifically treat pain.The GluN2D subunit of NMDAR is highly expressed embryonically but uncommon at mature synapses in the brain, while playing a functional role in mature lamina I neurons.This study aimed to test whether GluN2D-containing NMDARs are necessary for BDNF-mediated potentiation of NMDARs, whether NMDARs containing the GluN2D subunit are functionally present at juvenile lamina I synapses and whether these receptors are directly potentiated by SFKs.Pharmacological inhibition of either GluN2D or GluN2B completely prevented potentiation by BDNF in adult spinal cord slices.Inhibition of GluN2A-and GluN2B-containing NMDARs resulted in significant remaining charge transfer through NMDARs, attributed to GluN2D-containing NMDARs.When GluN2B-or GluN2Dcontaining NMDARs were pharmacologically isolated, SFK activation failed to potentiate either isolated receptor subtype.We propose that lamina I of the spinal cord dorsal horn may contain triheteromeric GluN2B/D NMDARs which do not undergo potentiation in the presence of antagonists of GluN2B or GluN2D.Targeting the GluN2D subunit may provide a useful therapeutic strategy to ameliorate pain hypersensitivity as a result of BDNF-mediated potentiation.I would like to thank my supervisor, Dr. Michael Hildebrand, for all of his advice and support with this project.I would also like to thank Hadir Mahmoud for introducing me to electrophysiological recording and teaching me juvenile rat spinal cord isolation.Biocytin imaging could not have been completed without the help of Jeffrey Landrigan, who stained and imaged the tissue, while troubleshooting every step of the way.Finally, I would like to thank my sister, lab mate and mentor, Annemarie Dedek, who was a constant source of advice and inspiration throughout my work.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPain Mechanisms and Treatments→French-language works237,207→