MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3110362087 · doi:10.1093/ehjci/ehaa946.0927

Non-fatal cardiovascular events preceding sudden cardiac death in patients with an acute myocardial infarction complicated by heart failure: insights from the High-Risk-Myocardial-Infarction database

2020· article· en· W3110362087 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Sonya Hui, Abhinav Sharma, Kieran F. Docherty, John J.V. McMurray, B. Pitt, Kenneth Dickstein, Marc A. Pfeffer, Nicolas Girerd, Patrick Rossignol, João Pedro Ferreira, Faı̈ez Zannad

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Heart Journal · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
Canadian institutionsMcGill University Health Centre
FundersMcGill University
KeywordsMedicineMyocardial infarctionInternal medicineHeart failureCardiologySudden cardiac deathEjection fractionIncidence (geometry)Sudden deathInfarction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Sudden cardiac death (SCD) is responsible for 20–40% of mortality following acute myocardial infarction (AMI). The risk of SCD is even higher among patients with AMI complicated by heart failure (HF) (either clinically apparent HF or left ventricular dysfunction). The temporal relationship between an AMI complicated by HF and subsequent SCD and the association of non-fatal cardiovascular (CV) events following AMI with SCD has yet to be described. Purpose Among patients with AMI complicated by HF, we evaluated the probability and temporal association of subsequent non-fatal cardiovascular (CV) events (HF hospitalization, recurrent MI, or stroke) and SCD. Methods The High-Risk Myocardial Infarction (HRMI) database contains 28,771 patients with signs of HF or reduced LV ejection fraction (<40%) after AMI. Among patients with an AMI complicated by HF, we used adjudicated cause of death from the HRMI Database to identify: 1) the temporal distribution of SCD among patients following an index AMI; 2) the probability of having SCD following a non-fatal CV event following the index AMI. Results Median follow-up was 1.9 years. Mean age was 65.0±11.5 years and 70% were male. The incidence of CV death was 7.9 per 100 patient-year [py] and for SCD was 3.1 per 100py (40% of CV deaths). SCD rates were highest in the early period (<90 days) after AMI and decreased over time. Recurrent MI preceded 9.6% of SCD after a median time of 145 days; HF hospitalization preceded 17.0% of SCD after a median 144 days; and stroke preceded 2.7% of SCD after a median of 138 days (vs. non-sudden CV death: MI 46.6% at 1 days, HF hospitalization: 30.9% at 67 days, stroke 12.9% at 9 days). The incidence of SCD preceded by HF hospitalization was significantly higher than SCD without preceding HF hospitalization. Conclusion Among patients with AMI complicated by HF, SCD predominantly occurred in the early “high-risk” period after AMI; SCD rates decreased afterwards. Patients with non-fatal HF hospitalizations during follow-up may have a higher subsequent SCD risk. Preventing HF onset after MI may help decreasing SCD. Proportion of sudden cardiac death Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Public Institution(s). Main funding source(s): Lucien Award, McGill University

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Heart Journal→Same topicCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias→French-language works237,207→