MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3110382451 · doi:10.1016/j.tvjl.2020.105583

Prevalence of cardiac arrhythmias and R-R interval variation in healthy Thoroughbred horses during official Chuckwagon races and recovery

2020· article· en· W3110382451 on OpenAlexafffund
Shannon Massie, R.J. Bezugley, Katherine McDonald, Renaud Léguillette

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Veterinary Journal · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldVeterinary
TopicVeterinary Equine Medical Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersUniversity of Calgary
KeywordsMedicineHeart rateCardiologyInternal medicinePercentileHorseElectrocardiographyBlood pressureBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The prevalence and severity of cardiac arrhythmias in healthy racehorses undergoing competition is not well defined. The aim was to characterize arrhythmias in Thoroughbreds participating in official Chuckwagon races and to determine normal beat-to-beat (R-R) variability during supramaximal exercise. Electrocardiograph (ECG) recordings were obtained during pre-race, race, and active-recovery from 82 clinically healthy Thoroughbreds. ECG recordings were analyzed for arrhythmias and mean percent R-R deviation. Plasma lactate and high-sensitivity troponin (hs-cTnT) were also measured. Fifty-two ECGs were included in the analysis. Arrhythmias were seen in 48/52 horses (92%) and were predominantly isolated events. No complex rhythms were observed. During the race, 92% of horses had arrhythmias (81% supraventricular premature complex [SVPC]; 33% ventricular premature complex [VPC]). Eleven percent of racing arrhythmias were VPCs (all singlets except for two couplets). During active-recovery, 58% of horses had arrhythmias (56% SVPC; 15% VPCs): Three horses had VPC couplets and one horse had a VPC triplet. All plasma hs-cTnT were within normal limits. The measured lactate was 28.5 ± 4.5 mmol/L, confirming supramaximal exercise. R-R variation ranged between -9.5 to +18.8% during pre-race (mean heart rate [HR], 155 ± 22 beats per min [bpm]), -27.8 to +45.3% during racing (mean HR, 200 ± 9 bpm) and -16.4 to +40.1% during active-recovery (mean HR, 165 ± 14 bpm). Maximal and 1st percentile R-R shortening and lengthening were significantly greater at race than pre-race and active-recovery (P < 0.0001). Racing and active-recovery maximal R-R lengthening were significantly greater than pre-race (P = 0.0003). Supraventricular premature complexes and VPCs are prevalent in healthy horses undergoing Chuckwagon racing. R-R variation is greater during racing than has previously been described.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.087
GPT teacher head0.357
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Veterinary JournalSame topicVeterinary Equine Medical ResearchFrench-language works237,207