Prevalence of cardiac arrhythmias and R-R interval variation in healthy Thoroughbred horses during official Chuckwagon races and recovery
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The prevalence and severity of cardiac arrhythmias in healthy racehorses undergoing competition is not well defined. The aim was to characterize arrhythmias in Thoroughbreds participating in official Chuckwagon races and to determine normal beat-to-beat (R-R) variability during supramaximal exercise. Electrocardiograph (ECG) recordings were obtained during pre-race, race, and active-recovery from 82 clinically healthy Thoroughbreds. ECG recordings were analyzed for arrhythmias and mean percent R-R deviation. Plasma lactate and high-sensitivity troponin (hs-cTnT) were also measured. Fifty-two ECGs were included in the analysis. Arrhythmias were seen in 48/52 horses (92%) and were predominantly isolated events. No complex rhythms were observed. During the race, 92% of horses had arrhythmias (81% supraventricular premature complex [SVPC]; 33% ventricular premature complex [VPC]). Eleven percent of racing arrhythmias were VPCs (all singlets except for two couplets). During active-recovery, 58% of horses had arrhythmias (56% SVPC; 15% VPCs): Three horses had VPC couplets and one horse had a VPC triplet. All plasma hs-cTnT were within normal limits. The measured lactate was 28.5 ± 4.5 mmol/L, confirming supramaximal exercise. R-R variation ranged between -9.5 to +18.8% during pre-race (mean heart rate [HR], 155 ± 22 beats per min [bpm]), -27.8 to +45.3% during racing (mean HR, 200 ± 9 bpm) and -16.4 to +40.1% during active-recovery (mean HR, 165 ± 14 bpm). Maximal and 1st percentile R-R shortening and lengthening were significantly greater at race than pre-race and active-recovery (P < 0.0001). Racing and active-recovery maximal R-R lengthening were significantly greater than pre-race (P = 0.0003). Supraventricular premature complexes and VPCs are prevalent in healthy horses undergoing Chuckwagon racing. R-R variation is greater during racing than has previously been described.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".