MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3110500283 · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2004.04795

Exemplar VAE: Linking Generative Models, Nearest Neighbor Retrieval, and\n Data Augmentation

2020· preprint· W3110500283 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuearXiv (Cornell University) · 2020
Typepreprint
Language
FieldComputer Science
TopicGenerative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMNIST databaseGenerative modelArtificial intelligenceComputer sciencePattern recognition (psychology)k-nearest neighbors algorithmEstimatorNearest neighbor searchGenerative grammarMathematicsArtificial neural networkStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We introduce Exemplar VAEs, a family of generative models that bridge the gap\nbetween parametric and non-parametric, exemplar based generative models.\nExemplar VAE is a variant of VAE with a non-parametric prior in the latent\nspace based on a Parzen window estimator. To sample from it, one first draws a\nrandom exemplar from a training set, then stochastically transforms that\nexemplar into a latent code and a new observation. We propose retrieval\naugmented training (RAT) as a way to speed up Exemplar VAE training by using\napproximate nearest neighbor search in the latent space to define a lower bound\non log marginal likelihood. To enhance generalization, model parameters are\nlearned using exemplar leave-one-out and subsampling. Experiments demonstrate\nthe effectiveness of Exemplar VAEs on density estimation and representation\nlearning. Importantly, generative data augmentation using Exemplar VAEs on\npermutation invariant MNIST and Fashion MNIST reduces classification error from\n1.17% to 0.69% and from 8.56% to 8.16%.\n

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Open science
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.956
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.004
Open science0.0040.011
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.222
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.009 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it