MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3110580867 · doi:10.1093/ehjci/ehaa946.2605

Next-day discharge after transcatheter aortic valve implantation

2020· article· en· W3110580867 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Z.S Gu, Jonathan Bates-Powell, Raj Das, Azfar Zaman, Richard Edwards

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Heart Journal · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineInterquartile rangeStenosisMyocardial infarctionPercutaneousSurgeryPercutaneous coronary interventionAortic valve stenosisCardiologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is being used increasingly in patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis. Few studies focused on hospital length of stay (LOS) and feasibility of next-day discharge. Purpose This study aims to evaluate the feasibility and factors associated with next-day discharge post TAVI, which can be used to help selecting suitable patients for a “fast-track” TAVI admission. Methods Data from all TAVI procedures conducted at our centre from January 2014 to March 2019 were collected in our local TAVI registry, and analysed retrospectively. Patients discharged within 1 day of TAVI (early discharge group) were compared with consecutive patients discharged after 24 h (late discharge group). Degree of frailty was assessed by the Canadian Study of Health and Aging (CSHA) frailty scale, and baseline functional status was assessed by Katz index of independence in activities of daily living. Results Of 502 patients, 274 (54.6%) were male, mean age 83.2±7.3 years, and 87 (17.7%) patients were considered frail by CSHA frailty scale. Median Katz index was 6 (i.e. functionally independent, interquartile range [IQR] 1), and mean logistic Euroscore 17.4±10.7. Percutaneous transfemoral access was performed in 468 (95.5%), and general anaesthesia was used in 64 (14.4%) patients. Early complications before discharge were comparable to national standards: death in 11 (2.3%), myocardial infarction (MI) in 1 (0.2%), permanent pacemaker (PPM) in 20 (4.3%), gastrointestinal bleed in 3 (0.6%), and tamponade in 5 (1.1%) patients. Median LOS post procedure was 2 (IQR 3), median length of total hospital stay was 3 (IQR 5). Early discharge was achieved in 213 (44.7%) patients. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that male gender (odds ratio [OR]: 2.81, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.68 to 4.7; p<0.001), baseline New York Heart Association (NYHA) class below III (OR: 2.04, 95% CI 1.19 to 3.51; p=0.01) were associated with early discharge after TAVI. Furthermore, advancing age (OR: 0.96, 95% CI 0.93–0.99; p=0.02), and presence of extensive ascending aorta calcification (OR: 0.38, 95% CI 0.16–0.88; p=0.025) were associated with less probability of early discharge (i.e. presence of these features were associated with delayed discharge). Conclusions Next-day discharge after TAVI can be achieved in nearly half of all patients. Male younger patients with minimal symptoms at baseline (NYHA < III), without feature of extensive ascending aorta calcification (porcelain aorta) are a potential suitable group to be considered for a “fast-track” next-day TAVI discharge. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.326
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Heart Journal→Same topicCardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments→French-language works237,207→