Electrical stimulation of the medial orbitofrontal cortex in humans elicits pleasant olfactory perceptions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Olfactory hallucinations can be part of epileptic seizures of orbitofrontal origin. Olfactory hallucinations, however, are rare and therefore the semiology, localization and lateralization characteristics are underdetermined. In addition, many discrepancies are found in the literature regarding olfactory processing and orbitofrontal (OF) functions and olfactory function. Particularly, the questions of laterality and affective component in coding of odors in the OF cortex remain controversial. AIMS: This study explored whether cortical electrical stimulation of the OF and mesiotemporal brain can trigger olfactory hallucinations with special focus on olfactory percepts in terms of laterality and hedonics. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eight patients with temporal lobe epilepsy participated in the study, at the time of invasive exploration of their epilepsy. The most distal contact of the OF and anterior hippocampus depth electrodes were stimulated (50 Hz, 0.2 ms biphasic pulse; maximal stimulation 4 mA). Patients were instructed to report any kind of sensation they might experience. Intracranial depth electrodes were localized (iElectrodes): subject-specific brain mask, subcortical segmentation and cortical parcellation based on the Destrieux atlas (FreeSurfer) were superposed to the coregistered T1-weighted MRI and CT images (SPM). The center of mass of each electrode-artifact cluster determined the electrode localization. The electrode labeling was done in patient space. To obtain the electrode coordinates in Montreal Neurological Institute (MNI) space, the images obtained previously in the patient space were first segmented and normalized (SPM). Then, the localization procedure (iElectrodes) was run again with these new normalized images in MNI space. RESULTS: No hallucination was evoked by stimulation, neither of the right nor the left hippocampus (8/8 patients). Pleasant olfactory hallucinations were evoked by OF stimulation in 5/8 patients in either hemisphere. Patients named the percept as the smell of lemon or coffee for example. Among those 5 patients, electrodes were localized in the cortex of the olfactory sulcus, medial orbital sulcus or medial OF gyrus. Increasing stimulation amplitude changed the olfactory percept identification in 3 out of those 5 patients. No affective judgement or change in perceived odor intensity was reported by the patients. No hallucination was evoked by the stimulation of the white matter of the medial OF brain in 3/8 patients independently of the hemisphere stimulated. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that stimulation of the cortex of the medial OF brain and not of its white matter elicits specific pleasant olfactory hallucinations independently of the hemisphere stimulated, supporting one symmetrical olfactory processing in human.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".