GCT-42. CLINICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF LOCALIZED CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM NON-GERMINOMATOUS GERM CELL TUMORS (NGGCT) PATIENTS ENROLLED ON ACNS1123 WITH RELAPSE: A CHILDREN’S ONCOLOGY GROUP (COG) STUDY
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract ACNS1123 was a Children’s Oncology Group Phase 2 study that was undertaken to determine whether irradiation could be safely reduced without impacting survival in a subgroup of NGGCT patients. Between May 2012-Jan 2017, 107 eligible patients were accrued to Stratum 1 (NGGCT stratum). Sixty-six (61.7%) patients achieved a complete/partial response (CR/PR) to induction chemotherapy and received 30.6Gy whole ventricular field irradiation followed by 54Gy tumor-bed boost achieving a 2-year progression-free survival rate of 89% (95% CI:81%-97%) and overall survival rate of 92% (95% CI:86%- 99%). Eight patients progressed; 6 had a spinal relapse and 2 patients had a local plus spinal relapse. Seven of eight patients had marker elevation at relapse and data was not available in one patient. At diagnosis, location was pineal in six cases, suprasellar in one, and bifocal in one case. Four patients had beta HCGβ and AFP elevation and two each had HCGβ and AFP elevation alone at diagnosis. Only two patients had HCGβ or AFP >1000 (HCGβ 3550 in one patient and AFP of 1340 in another). All eight patients were CR by markers; four had radiographic CR and four had a PR. Five patients had surgery at diagnosis: two had embryonal carcinoma, one germinoma, and two mixed germ cell tumor with malignant elements on histology. A consistent significant risk factor could not be identified to explain excess of spinal failures seen in our cohort.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".