MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3110669810 · doi:10.22215/etd/2014-10386

Sequence stratigraphic, lithostratigraphic and stable isotope analysis of the Minto Inlet Formation and Kilian Formation of the Shaler Supergroup, Northwest Territories

2014· dissertation· en· W3110669810 on OpenAlexaffabout
John K.G. Prince

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicPaleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyEvaporiteSiliciclasticSedimentary depositional environmentDolostonePaleontologyGeochemistryRodiniaStructural basinGeomorphologySedimentary rockCarbonate rockRift

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Minto Inlet Formation (<891 Ma; >762 Ma) is a ~300 m thick unit of predominantly claystone, siltstone, carbonate rock and sulphate evaporite rock.Three informal, regionally extensive members are defined: the lower evaporite, carbonate and upper evaporite members.The Kilian Formation (<795 Ma; >723 Ma) is a >500 m thick succession that is compositionally similar to the Minto Inlet Formation, and is here subdivided into 4 third-order depositional sequences and their respective systems tracts.Both formations reflect deposition on a subtidal to supratidal ramp, influenced by siliciclastic supply, arid climate and tectono-eustasy.Sulphate samples from the Minto Inlet Formation are characterized by low average δ 34 S (~17‰) with little secular variability (σ = 1.36‰, n = 67), whereas samples from the Kilian Formation show high average δ 34 S (~26‰) and high secular variability (σ= 8.63‰, n = 67).Biogeochemical models indicate that a temporary reorganization of the sulphur flux out of the ocean, characterized by an initial decrease in the pyrite burial fraction (ƒ p ) from ~1 to ~0.3, was initiated prior to the deposition of the Minto Inlet Formation, and a return of ƒ p values near 1 (recorded in the Kilian Formation), is inferred to have occurred during deposition of the intervening Wynniatt Formation.These changes are interpreted to be the result of widespread and thick (basin-scale) evaporite deposition during the middle Neoproterozoic, possibly driven by the migration of Rodinia and the multiple intracratonic basins which it hosted across low latitude arid climate belts.I would like to thank my supervisors Rob Rainbird and George Dix for allowing me to attempt a project of this scale.Thanks to Rob for initially taking me on to the Victoria Island project, his patience and his faith in me and my work have been infinite.Thank you to Boz Wing for all his multiple, multiple sulphur isotope consultations and allowing me to use lab space at McGill for the very messy and long process of carbonate associated sulphate.I would like to thank Jean Bedard for putting me up in his home both before and after my first field season and for all of the "safety meetings" while in the field.Thank you to Etienne Girard for taking time to introduce me to Arc GIS and for sacrificing the bones of his ankle for our field internet connection.Thank you to Sharon, Rosanda and Susie for the gourmet all-you-can-eat meals every night in the field.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.779
Threshold uncertainty score0.440

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPaleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils→French-language works237,207→