Video-Based Breathing Rate Monitoring in Sleeping Subjects
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper addresses the challenge of detecting the breathing cessation in sleeping subjects, via breathing pattern monitoring at a distance and under "night-light" conditions. We investigate a near-infrared video-based approach to estimate the breathing rate, based on chest or back movements. A body pose estimation algorithm and the Lucas-Kanade optical flow method are combined to automatically detect the Region of Interest (ROI) represented by a grid of points. The movement of the ROI is then translated into the frequency of respiratory events. We used a dataset with 28 near-infrared videos, as well as 11 videos of subject uncovered and partially covered by blankets. We compared the breathing rate measurements provided by a wearable device with the ones estimated by the video-based approach. A linear correlation analysis of both measurements resulted in a coefficient of determination of 0.925, and accuracy of 99.70% for the first dataset, and 0.873 and 88.95% for the second dataset, respectively. The ultimate application is to detect abnormalities in breathing and health emergencies in environments such as homeless shelters.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".