Retrieval of Multiple Spatiotemporally Correlated Images on Tourist Attractions Based on Image Processing
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The thriving of information technology (IT) has elevated the demand for intelligent query and retrieval of information about the tourist attractions of interest, which are the bases for preparing convenient and personalized itineraries. To realize accurate and rapid query of tourist attraction information (not limited to text information), this paper proposes a spatiotemporal feature extraction method and a ranking and retrieval method for multiple spatiotemporally correlated images (MSCIs) on tourist attractions based on deeply recursive convolutional network (DRCN). Firstly, the authors introduced the acquisition process of candidate spatiotemporally correlated images on tourist attractions, including both coarse screening and fine screening. Next, the workflow of spatiotemporal feature extraction from tourist attraction images was explained, as well as he proposed convolutional long short-term memory (ConvLSTM) algorithm. After that, the ranking model of MSCIs was constructed and derived. Experimental results demonstrate that our strategy is effective in the retrieval of tourist attraction images. The research results shed light on the fast and accurate retrieval of other types of images.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".