MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3110869095 · doi:10.1097/gox.0000000000003146

ACTA2 Mutation: Microsurgeon Beware!

2020· article· en· W3110869095 on OpenAlexaff
Ayesha Punjabi, David E. Kurlander, Corinne Wee, Tobias C. Long, Joshua A. Gillis, Joseph S. Khouri

Bibliographic record

VenuePlastic & Reconstructive Surgery Global Open · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicConnective tissue disorders research
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineSurgeryThrombosisVenous thrombosis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Patients with the alpha actin 2 genetic mutation suffer early onset aneurismal and vascular-occlusive conditions due to dysfunctional smooth muscle contractility. Outcomes of free flap reconstruction in this patient population are unknown. Here we report the case of a 21-year-old woman with alpha actin 2 mutation who required decompressive hemicraniectomy following an acute stroke. The entire Cushing flap underwent necrosis, requiring debridement and exposing dura. This condition was treated with a free latissimus myocutaneous flap. The patient's post-operative course was complicated by venous thrombosis, requiring intra-flap tPA and revision of the venous anastomosis with a saphenous vein graft. Ultimately the distal 75% of the flap was lost, leaving the dura exposed. The patient's course was further complicated by multiple wound healing complications: large areas of necrosis of the latissimus and saphenous vein donor sites, the neck vessel recipient site, and the right hand after IV infiltration. She ultimately healed with a regenerative tissue matrix strategy. Reconstructive options with no or minimal donor site morbidity should be considered in patients with the alpha actin 2 mutation. We encourage further reporting of outcomes in these patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.063
Threshold uncertainty score0.211

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0630.017

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.302
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePlastic & Reconstructive Surgery Global OpenSame topicConnective tissue disorders researchFrench-language works237,207