MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3110896122 · doi:10.1002/alz.044056

Sensory function, cognition, and brain structure in SCD, MCI, and AD: Initial findings from the COMPASS‐ND Study

2020· article· en· W3110896122 on OpenAlexaff
Natalie Phillips, Faisal Al‐Yawer, Nathalie Giroud, Sana Rehan, Zoe Pappadatos, Paul Mick, Walter Wittich, M. Kathleen Pichora‐Fuller

Bibliographic record

VenueAlzheimer s & Dementia · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicOlfactory and Sensory Function Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoUniversité de MontréalUniversity of SaskatchewanConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDementiaAudiologyCognitionPsychologyCognitive declineCognitive testOlfactionMedicineDiseaseNeuroscienceInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background There is a strong relationship between sensory and cognitive function in older adults and impairment in hearing, vision, and olfaction are each independently associated with dementia. However, these have rarely been examined together in persons with dementia, nor their concurrent relationship with cognitive function and brain structure. The Comprehensive Assessment of Neurodegeneration and Dementia (COMPASS‐ND) study is a large‐scale study of older Canadians who are living with, or are at risk for, dementia, including those with subjective cognitive decline (SCD), mild cognitive impairment (MCI), Alzheimer’s disease (AD), other causes of dementia, and normal controls. We collect clinical and cognitive data, structural brain imaging, and measures of sensory function. Method Complete sensory, cognitive, and brain imaging data have been released on participants with study diagnoses of SCD (n=35; 74% women, mean age = 69.4 years; mean education = 16.6 years), MCI (n=79; 49% women, mean age = 73.5 years; mean education = 15.5 years), and AD (n=21; 10% women, mean age = 75.9 years; mean education = 15.5 years). Hearing function was assessed by pure tone screening at 25 and 40 dB and with a computerized speech in noise perception task. Vision function was assessed by measuring reading acuity and contrast sensitivity. Olfaction was assessed with a 16‐item olfactory recognition test. Result Controlling for age, sex, and education, cognitive performance measures decreased over the groups (SCI>MCI>AD), as expected. The groups differed in contrast sensitivity and olfaction, but not hearing (audiometric category, perceiving digits in noise) or visual reading acuity. Poorer olfaction was associated with poorer auditory episodic memory and lower hippocampal volume. Poorer hearing thresholds were associated with lower right hippocampal volume in SCD participants. Within MCI participants, poorer hearing was associated with a disruption in the relationship between auditory episodic memory and a number of variables, including visual episodic memory and lateralized hippocampal volume. Conclusion These results illustrate a complex interplay between sensory‐cognitive‐brain measures in older adults with or at risk for dementia and suggest that sensory status has important implications for brain structure and clinical status.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.125
Threshold uncertainty score0.249

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.128
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.156 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlzheimer s & DementiaSame topicOlfactory and Sensory Function StudiesFrench-language works237,207