MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3110954960 · doi:10.23889/ijpds.v5i5.1645

Changing Practice Patterns Among Canadian Primary Care Physicians: Cross-Provincial Analysis of Linked Health Data

2020· article· en· W3110954960 on OpenAlexaffabout
M. Ruth Lavergne, Sandra Peterson, Megan Ahuja, David Rudoler, Laurie J. Goldsmith, Agnes Grudniewicz, Emily Gard Marshall

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal for Population Data Science · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicPrimary Care and Health Outcomes
Canadian institutionsDalhousie UniversityUniversity of OttawaUniversity of British ColumbiaOntario Tech UniversitySimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFamily medicineMedicineCohortPrimary careService (business)PopulationPer capitaHealth careBusinessEnvironmental health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

IntroductionCanadians report persistent problems accessing primary care despite an increasing per-capita supply of primary care physicians (PCPs). There is speculation that PCPs, especially those early in their careers, may be working less and/or choosing to practice in focused clinical areas rather than comprehensive family medicine.
 Objectives and ApproachOur objectives were to compare practice patterns among early-career (<10 years in practice) and established (10+ years) PCPs and to determine if any changes over time reflect cohort effects (attributes unique to recent cohorts of PCPs), or period effects (changes over time across all PCPs). We accessed linked population and physician registry data, physician billing data, hospital discharge records, and vital statistics in each of three Canadian provinces from 1996/7 to 2017/8. Physician fee schedules are negotiated separately by province which means that while fields capturing service dates, dollars billed, and diagnosis codes are directly comparable, other fields capture similar, but not identical information across provinces (e.g. specific fee codes and service location codes). We developed measures of services volume, continuity, and comprehensiveness of primary care that could be applied across provinces and used these to describe practice patterns over two decades and explore cohort and period effects.
 ResultsMeasures of service volume (total patient contacts, number of unique patients seen) and continuity are lower among early-career physicians but the gap between early-career and established physicians has not changed. Measures of comprehensiveness of care, including provision of services in home, long-term care, hospital, and emergency department, as well as indicators of focused practice, hospitalist and locum care show more varied patterns, with declines in comprehensiveness across all physicians, but more evidence of focused practice among early-career physicians.
 Conclusion / ImplicationsFindings have implications both for health workforce planning and organizational reforms to support access to comprehensive primary care.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.234
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.005
Open science0.0040.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.166
GPT teacher head0.521
Teacher spread0.355 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal for Population Data ScienceSame topicPrimary Care and Health OutcomesFrench-language works237,207