MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3111077685 · doi:10.1002/alz.043444

Awake two‐photon fluorescence imaging in the TgF344‐AD Alzheimer’s disease rat model

2020· article· en· W3111077685 on OpenAlexaff
Zaid A.M. Al‐Azzawi, Illsung L. Joo, Margaret M. Koletar, Mary Hill, James Mester, Bojana Stefanovic, JoAnne McLaurin

Bibliographic record

VenueAlzheimer s & Dementia · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOptical Imaging and Spectroscopy Techniques
Canadian institutionsSunnybrook HospitalUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNeurovascular bundleNeuroscienceTwo-photon excitation microscopyMedicineCerebral blood flowPremovement neuronal activityCortex (anatomy)PathologyBiologyCardiologyFluorescence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Inextricably linked with the manifestations of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is vascular compromise which arises early during disease progression. Vascular compromise leads to subsequent failure in neurovascular coupling, plaque clearance, and oxygen delivery. Previous imaging studies have relied on the use of anesthetics to study vascular compromise. It is widely recognized that anesthetics have a wide range of effects on normal brain physiology including dampening neurovascular coupling, slowing neuronal responses, and decreasing brain metabolism. Therefore, there is a need for better imaging models which examine vascular responses during the early stages of AD without the confounds of anesthesia. The aim of this study is to develop the methodology for non‐anesthetized 2‐photon fluorescence imaging using the TgF344‐AD rat model to examine vascular compromise in the ‘prodromal’ phase of AD. Method The TgF344‐AD rat recapitulates the age‐dependent nature of AD exhibiting a ‘prodromal’ phase wherein underlying neuropathological changes are occurring without overt cognitive deficits. A prominent change during this period is vascular compromise. Recent advancements in 2‐photon fluorescence microscopy (2PFM) have allowed for high depth imaging of live tissues and has been significantly used in deciphering neuro‐vascular responses within the brains of various animals. 2PFM allows for the direct measurement of blood flow changes within blood vessels in response to neuronal activation. A cranial window is implanted into 4‐month old rats to gain optical access to the barrel cortex. Result In order to track vascular responses along branching points of major diving vessels within the barrel cortex, a 1.5mm microprism is implanted adjacent to the barrel cortex providing sideways visualization into the vasculature within the region. A 3D‐printed motorized treadmill was constructed in order to calm and distract the conscious animal while imaging is undertaken. Preliminary results in anesthetized animals show that qualitative images can be obtained through the prism within the barrel cortex. Conclusion This method shows promise in providing a more naturalistic model for studying functional vascular responses over time. It provides a platform for generating novel insights into neurovascular coupling in disease and healthy conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.322
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlzheimer s & DementiaSame topicOptical Imaging and Spectroscopy TechniquesFrench-language works237,207