MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3111151521 · doi:10.1300/j087v35n01_01

Time Juggling

2001· article· en· W3111151521 on OpenAlex
Judaline Hodgson, Anna Dienhart, Kerry Daly

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Divorce & Remarriage · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicWork-Family Balance Challenges
Canadian institutionsUniversity of GuelphUpper Grand Family Health Team
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDutyPsychologyControl (management)Variety (cybernetics)Value (mathematics)Social psychologyComputer sciencePolitical scienceLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This qualitative study examines the employed single mother experience of time. Exploring their experiences of the “social time” concept, as opposed to natural (or clock) time, the themes which emerged included unrelenting responsibility, fragile control, precious moments, and a contrast between on-duty and off-duty time. The many roles these mothers fulfil require that they continually make decisions about how time will be allocated. Unexpected events interfere with carefully made plans such that the degree of control over time issues is experienced as tentative. As a consequence of the unrelenting responsibility and the fragile nature of their control over time, these mothers value precious moments when family time can be given priority. A sharp contrast exists between on-duty time and off-duty time when the children stay with the other parent for a short period. Off-duty time is mixed in nature. While the mothers are not engaged in direct parenting of the children, they still experience off-duty time as having a wide variety of demands associated with parenting.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.676
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it