MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3111281213 · doi:10.1002/alz.043569

Comorbidity to dementia: The contributions of focal subclinical ischemia to pathogenesis in a mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease

2020· article· en· W3111281213 on OpenAlexaff
Mingzhe Liu, Tina L. Beckett, Adrienne Dorr, Bojana Stefanovic, JoAnne McLaurin

Bibliographic record

VenueAlzheimer s & Dementia · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAlzheimer's disease research and treatments
Canadian institutionsSunnybrook HospitalUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSubclinical infectionIschemiaPathogenesisMedicineStroke (engine)DementiaMicrogliaInternal medicinePathologyCardiologyNeuroscienceDiseasePsychologyInflammation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Although stroke and Alzheimer’s disease (AD) are distinctly different diseases, the risk for both substantially increase with aging, with stroke survivors being twice as likely to develop dementia. Although subclinical ischemic events do not present with outward symptoms, they share similar risk factors and outnumber overt ischemic events >9 to 1, with 31% of adults over the age of 65 experiencing at least one such event. The ischemic cascade may initiate neuropathological changes, leading to an increased susceptibility to develop AD. Hence, there is a need to elucidate the relationship between subclinical ischemia and AD pathogenesis. Method The endothelin‐1 (ET1) model of ischemia was utilized for subclinical focal stroke induction, while the inducible APPsi:tTA mouse was used to model AD, as it allows for temporal control of APP gene expression. To examine the impact of focal ischemia on AD, bigenic (tTA/APP) (DTg) and control (tTA) mice underwent unilateral stereotaxic ET1 or sham (vehicle) surgery in the medial prefrontal cortex and allowed to recover, before turning on APP gene expression. Structural MRI one week following surgery allowed for evaluation of the size and location of the stroke. Behavioral tests were performed to examine for changes as a result of subclinical focal ischemia and post‐APP expression. Immunohistochemistry and immunofluorescence were conducted for changes in amyloid load (6F/3D), astrocytes (GFAP), microglia (Iba1) 7 weeks post‐APP expression. Result Analysis of MRI confirmed the presence of subclinical ischemic events in ET1 DTg tTA mice. ET1 DTg animals showed significant behavioral deficits in marble burying, nest‐building, open field and Y‐maze, post expression of APP when compared to tTA controls. DTg animals also showed an increase in astrocyte and microglial activation post‐APP expression, but no differences were found in amyloid load between ET1 DTg and sham DTg animals. Conclusion The APPsi‐tTA mouse model allowed for controlled APP transgene expression– where the AD pathogenesis occurs independently after the initial subclinical event. Results show that subclinical ischemic insult to the brain enhance AD pathogenesis and allow for better understanding of the impact of comorbidities to AD progression.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.078
GPT teacher head0.352
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlzheimer s & Dementia→Same topicAlzheimer's disease research and treatments→French-language works237,207→