MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3111348718 · doi:10.1117/12.2576314

Maunakea Spectroscopic Explorer Low Moderate Resolution Spectrograph: paths toward the Preliminary Design Phase

2020· preprint· en· W3111348718 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Alexandre Jeanneau, Éric Prieto, Nicolas Flagey, Alexis Hill, Kjetil Dohlen, R. Pelló, L. Tresse, Sylvie Brau-Nogué, Christophe Yèche, Pierre-Henri Carton

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstronomy and Astrophysical Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersInstitut National de Physique Nucléaire et de Physique des ParticulesCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueCentre National d’Etudes Spatiales
KeywordsSpectrographSpectral resolutionTelescopePhysicsConceptual designRemote sensingOpticsAstronomyAstrophysicsSpectral lineComputer scienceGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Maunakea Spectroscopic Explorer (MSE) is a 10m-class, wide-field (1.5 sq. degree) and high-multiplex (< 3000 fibers) spectroscopic facility that will replace the 3.6m Canada-France-Hawaii Telescope. With backend spectrographs operating at low (R ~ 3000), moderate (R ~ 6000) and high (R ~ 20/40 k) spectral resolution across the 0.36 – 1.8 µm range, MSE will be poised to address a variety of science questions among which the nature of dark matter, the origin of the elements in the periodic table, the mass of the neutrino, whilst enabling a new era of rapid-response and time-domain astronomy. This paper is a status report of the MSE Low Moderate Resolution spectrograph design, from the Conceptual Design Review (CoDR) towards the Preliminary Design Phase (PDP).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.047

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.065
GPT teacher head0.319
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAstronomy and Astrophysical ResearchFrench-language works237,207