MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3111418506 · doi:10.1093/jalm/jfaa191

Identification of Variants in Alpha-1-Antitrypsin by High Resolution Melting

2020· article· en· W3111418506 on OpenAlexafffund
Gawa Bidla, David S. Rosenblatt, Brian M. Gilfix

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicProtease and Inhibitor Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsMcGill University Health CentreMcGill University
FundersInstitut de recherche, Centre universitaire de santé McGill
KeywordsHigh Resolution MeltMelting curve analysisGenotypingGenotypeConcordanceGeneticsAlpha 1-antitrypsin deficiencygenomic DNABiologyMolecular biologyGenePolymerase chain reactionImmunology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Alpha-1-antitrypsin deficiency (AATD) is one of the most common hereditary disorders occurring in populations of European origin and is due to variants in SERPINA1, which encodes a protease inhibitor of neutrophil elastase, limiting lung damage from this enzyme. The World Health Organization has recommended that individuals with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and asthma be tested for AATD. The development of inexpensive and simple genetic testing will help to meet this goal. METHODS: Primers and synthetic SERPINA1 gene fragments (gBlocks) were designed for 5 AATD-associated variants. PCR was run on a CFX96 Thermal Cycler with High Resolution Melting (HRM) capacity and data analyzed using the supplied HRM-analysis software. Genomic DNA from individuals (n = 86) genotyped for the S and Z variants were used for validation. HRM-analysis was performed on 3 additional samples with low alpha-1-antitrypsin levels inconsistent with the genotype determined in our clinical laboratory. RESULTS: Unique normalized melt curve and difference curve patterns were identified for the AAT variants Z, S, I, F, and MMalton using gBlocks. Similar curve shapes were seen when these primers were used to analyze the gDNA samples. HRM identified the genotypes of the gDNA correctly with 100% concordance. The curve shapes of some samples did not match the melting patterns of the targeted variant. Sequencing was used to identify the variants, including rare AATD variants c.1108_1115delinsAAAAACA (p.Glu370Lysfs*31) and c.1130dup (p.Leu377fs). CONCLUSION: We developed a rapid and inexpensive HRM-analysis method for genotyping of Z, S, MMalton, I, and F variants that was also capable of detecting other variants.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.219

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Applied Laboratory MedicineSame topicProtease and Inhibitor MechanismsFrench-language works237,207