[<sup>18</sup>F]MK‐6240 depicts early and late Braak stages of neurofibrillary tangles in preclinical and symptomatic subjects
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background Postmortem Braak staging provides an index of disease stage and has therefore been incorporated as a core neuropathological criterion for the diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Recent in vivo studies using the tau positron emission tomography agent [18F]flortaucipir have shown low sensitivity to detect tau pathology in early Braak stages. These studies report Braak I‐II or greater in ∼20% of cognitively unimpaired elderly, in contrast to the ∼70‐90% of non‐zero Braak stage reported in postmortem studies. Here, we tested whether the novel high‐affinity tau tangles tracer [18F]MK‐6240 (6 fold > [18F]flortaucipir)can better identify individuals in the early stages of tau accumulation. Method To this end, we studied 301 individuals (30 young adults, 138 cognitively unimpaired (CU) elderly, 67 mild cognitive impairment (MCI), 54 AD dementia, and 12 frontotemporal dementia (FTD)) with amyloid‐b[18F]NAV4694, tau [18F]MK‐6240, magnetic resonance imaging, and clinical assessments. Results [18F]MK‐6240 discriminated AD from FTD dementia as well as predicted amyloid‐b positivity with the highest area under the curve in Braak I‐II region (=∼95‐100%)(Fig.1 and 2). [18F]MK‐6240 accumulation hierarchically followed the 6 Braak stages (Fig.3)in 98% of our population (Fig.4).91% of the elderly amyloid‐b positive and 46% of the elderly amyloid‐b negative displayed tau deposition, at least in the transentorhinal cortex (Braak I)(Fig.4). Cognition and amyloid‐b status explained most of the Braak stages variance (P<0.0001, R2=0.75). Tau deposition solely in the transentorhinal cortex was associated with an elevated prevalence of amyloid‐b, neurodegeneration, and cognitive impairment (P<0.0001). No single region‐of‐interest accurately segregated individuals into the 6 Braak stages (Fig.5). However, classification decision tree analysis suggested that a composite of transentorhinal, entorhinal, and hippocampal cortices(Braak I‐II) was the region‐of‐interest that best represented [18F]MK‐6240Braak stages (capacity of a region’ SUVR cutoff segregating individuals in 7 levels (Braak 0‐VI)) (accuracy=86.2%)(Fig.6). Conclusion Our results highlight that the hierarchical 6‐stage Braak model using [18F]MK‐6240 provides a robust index of early and late tau accumulation as well as disease stages in preclinical and symptomatic individuals. Tau positron emission tomography Braak staging using high‐affinity tracers has the potential to be incorporated in the diagnosis of living patients with AD.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".