MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3111452451 · doi:10.1093/neuonc/noaa215.428

EXTH-74. IND-ENABLING CHARACTERIZATION OF DUAL DRD2- AND ClpP-TARGETING AGENT ONC206 AS THE NEXT IMIPRIDONE FOR CLINICAL NEURO-ONCOLOGY

2020· article· en· W3111452451 on OpenAlexaff
Varun V. Prabhu, Sara Morrow, Abed Rahman Kawakibi, Yulia Jitkova, Jinkyu Jung, Neel S. Madhukar, Mathew J. Garnett, Ultan McDermott, Cyril H. Benes, Robert J. Wechsler‐Reya, Olivier Elemento, Sharon DeMorrow, Aaron D. Schimmer, Martin Stogniew, Brett Theeler, Mark R. Gilbert, Joshua E. Allen

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuro-Oncology · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCancer, Stress, Anesthesia, and Immune Response
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAgonistPharmacologyCell cultureAntagonistEndocrinologyInternal medicineReceptorChemistryMedicineBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract ONC201 is the first bitopic antagonist of dopamine receptor D2 (DRD2) and allosteric mitochondrial protease ClpP agonist, that is well tolerated and induces durable tumor regressions in H3 K27M-mutant glioma patients. ONC206, a derivative of ONC201, is also a bitopic DRD2 antagonist that exhibits enhanced non-competitive effects, nanomolar potency, and disruption of DRD2 homodimers. In these studies, a FITC-casein degradation assay revealed that ONC206 also acts as an agonist of human ClpP and has a 3-fold improved potency. GEPIA database analysis showed ClpP mRNA was overexpressed in glioblastoma cells relative to normal cells. Broad nanomolar efficacy of ONC206 (GI50 < 78-889nM, 72h) was observed in >1,000 GDSC cancer cell lines with the highest sensitivity in cell lines exhibiting high ClpP and/or DRD2+/DRD5- RNA expression signatures. Among solid tumors, nervous system related cell lines were particularly sensitive. ONC206 reduced the viability of normal human fibroblasts at higher doses (GI50 > 5µM), suggesting a wide therapeutic window. Antitumor efficacy without body weight loss was observed with 50 mg/kg weekly oral ONC206 in a subcutaneous xenograft model of DRD2-overexpressing, dopamine-secreting tumor cells. Oral ONC206 at 50mg/kg exhibited a ~12 µM plasma Cmax and ~6 hours terminal half-life in Sprague-Dawley rats. Additionally, 5–10 fold higher ONC206 concentrations were observed in adrenal gland, bile duct, brain and bone marrow relative to plasma. GLP toxicology studies with weekly oral ONC206 in Sprague-Dawley rats and beagle dogs revealed no dose-limiting toxicities. Mild and reversible body weight changes were observed at the highest evaluated dose in both species. The no-observed-adverse-effect level was ≥ 16.7 mg/kg in dogs and ≥ 50 mg/kg in rats that exceed efficacious doses. A 50 mg starting dose of ONC206 was selected for the first-in-human open label, dose escalation, and food effect Phase I study in biomarker-enriched adult recurrent primary CNS tumors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.082
GPT teacher head0.362
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeuro-OncologySame topicCancer, Stress, Anesthesia, and Immune ResponseFrench-language works237,207